Skip navigation

Category Archives: baghdad

We always believe the masses were ignorant and the rulers unjust. But we now know better. There are no more rulers, yet everybody remains equally devoid of any sense of justice. Including the masses, whom were now everywhere and nowhere, had known for some time now what the problems were. To claim that they should have made radical changes, is to deny their humanity and the social and biological conditions we were faced with. But that’s all over. The radical change has occurred. A revolution, if that means a saltational evolution in the reverse direction. Even though it’s very clear that there was no direction. No progress, no obvious horizon.
It wasn’t always like this. But there’s no going back. We’ve gone back. In so many ways it has become unlikely… – nay – impossible, to revert to that ancient state of degradation. We have entered a new phase. Unwilling, yet fully conscious.

“Please, no more. This is torture”. The man nearest to me was visibly fatigued. After the exorbitant act of asking somebody to do something else -in this case me- than what they were doing, others nodded in agreement; only tempered by their shyness and sense of guilt to tell a dying human what to do. But we were all dying and I felt no sense of entitlement to say out loud what all already knew. They had gathered here precisely to make the last hours of their lives count, not the analyze themselves into a depression. When death is so imminent, there’s no longer any time for sadness.

We marched on. Leaving this group behind. Or so we thought. I talked aloud endlessly and my companions said very little of this habit. Ignoring my ramblings and being visibly enerved by some rants, they’d tell me to “be quiet for a moment”, but almost always because silence was needed to proceed. Never because the sounds I was making made a semantic impact. The meaning was already known to everybody. I was just contemplating out loud.

“Haboob!”, several exclaimed simultaneously. We saw the sandstorm in the horizon, rolling over the distant hill. It wasn’t going straight for us, but we were heading straight for it. There was no real cover to speak of and a sense of duty informed our actions to head back and help the others if they were still alive. They weren’t. By the time we had reached them, the sandstorm had passed outside our radius and they were all dead for all intents and purposes. That that there were many purposes left to help you motivate your intentions. We gathered all supplies we could find. But our group was over twice their size and they only planned on waiting to die for a couple of days. Needless to say there weren’t a lot of supplies to be found.

The cadavers made my companions uneasy and they wished to return to the city. There were plenty of people their in comparison, most of whom were alive. Unable to choose novelty over nostalgia, I remained silent and followed the group back to what seemed familiar, but had become as alien as the rest of the environment. To say I wanted to experience the rest of the world, to meet new people, would have been a fallacious statement. I kept my companions for the same reasons they headed back to the city dwellers. That is to say, I followed them and they me. To keep has lost its significance. It’s all so ephemeral. So finite. So very, very short. We did not tolerate each other out of some sense of justice. It was compassion and a lack of wanting to be just. For it was to cruel and vengeful. It was too late. The human race has reached to finish line. There’s no point in trying to be first, last, fastest or anything like that. Perhaps kindest. People remained kind and those who were kind were treated kindly. But how cynical it is to be kind to a member of a dying species. If we didn’t know better, we’d console one another with lies. Knowing the end is near and there’s no reason to be upset. The people who became upset were far too homo- and suicidal to have lasted this long anyway. We were free to do what we want, but nobody knew what they should want. All hope is gone now and people just want to be alive until they die. To hope for more is hubris.

If we fight fire, we reserve something for it to feast on later on. I do not suggest we let it burn, while building new societies. But there“s something do be said for prevention and leisure.

I just saw the clip “Rise Against – Re-Education (Through Labor)” and it reminded me of Fight Club. But also of 24 and Xe.
The clip started with a quotation from John F. Kennedy:”Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

Now, if all of us (wealthy worldcitizens, access to internet etc) were to adopt this principle; the world would be an ugly place.

Don’t get me wrong, I like JFK. But the (cold) war rethoric bothers me. If anarchists (meaning people who identify themselves with the anti-authoritarian tradition) were to use the ‘propaganda of the act’ as it were, we’d all be terrorists.

If ANYBODY, starts adressing their grievances (such as state terror on a massive scale) by mimicing the abhorrent behavior, we’re in for a very long and destructive circle (if not spiral, but I doubt cycle) of violence.

Imagine, the anarchist cookbook and the destructive nature of such literature being applied by all extremes of the political spectrum. From left wing commies, claiming all private property is theft, to right-wing contractors who feel the only way to keep order is to do it themselves.
That doesn’t include the people desecrating public property because they feel what one arm of government does, they should annihilate its legs.

The logic is destructive. Meanly because it’s war logic. If you look at this as a war, we’re all going to be fucked.
But as george carlin points on (on education -must see!-), the owners of this country won’t allow us to learn anything. So if we (the masses) can’t think (if that’s reserved for elites), we’ll have to act. Without rational thought I feel this could easily lead into harsh situations.

However, if one (leftist) would replace say, class warfare with class cooperation, he’d quickly have a fundamental change of position (even it’s its only implemented after nationalising the collectives’ wealth); we’d end up with fascism.

Which is a difficult position to maintain. Of course, if you WANT power and you want to achieve your OWN political agenda: Fascism is the way to go.

It is the only thing that does not tolerate anarchy. It doesn’t even tolerate the mob. CIA had to rebuild that with the french connection (drug money, prohibition excluded liquids again). There was order in the streets. The manifesto had been somewhat realised. People listened, and the ones that didn’t were dealt with.

If I lived in the world wars, I hope I’d have been a pacifist. Maybe I’d had joined the resistance, because there was so much suffering around me and no wealth.

But right now, even if I were to -for the sake of argument- think of the current world regime/empire is more totalitarian than it could have been over 50 years ago, I’d still use non-violent means to address the issue.
Like say, words, ideas, concepts, etc.

There was a massive movement, even followed by the Czar (because his poor weaponry) leading up to the Great War. In the Second World War, it becomes hard to repeat Dwight on the american version of The Office and say that “it was a war we never should have gotten involved with”.
Even Einstein and Chomsky thought fighting it was right, and I kinda look upto these guys. But winning a war never determines who’s right, only who’s left.
In this case, the guys with the nukes won. Thank you a lot, Einstein!
And then there’s an MIT (pentagon budget) professor who teaches linguistics who can’t decide on paying taxes or not (or any other act of civil disobedience) because it might lead to fascism.

Of course, I don’t live in a country with the same budget lay-out (military is lik 15% here and most of it goes to social security and health, my region gives most its money away on education and health), so I pay my taxes (well I don’t because I’m a student and I hardly work, when I do the tariff is low and I give most of it away on causes so I get a refund). So even non-violent oppossition isn’t really an option for me either, either by voicing my opinion (because it’s easier to encounter people who might actually recognize me then in such a small country as mine) or by not paying taxes (even though 147 dossiers of 100000 known fraudulents cases are handed over to the justice department of further selection).

As for violence as legitimate means…To what? For what? What’s the end? In my world view it’s peace and non-violence. It’s dialogue, reason, and above all freedom and justice. The first two being the means. The latter two the goals, incompatible with legitimating violence.

For the ends are the means, and anarchism ought to be about deconstructing institutions of power (when classified as illegitimate), not about repeating mistakes of the past.

Make new ones. Do anything, try anthing. Just try not to infringe on other people’s right to do the same. And violence tends to target the weak. You may feel strong knowing that information is free and it’s surprisingly easy for any individual to destroy a lot of infrastructure, human lives, systems of dominance and whatnot.

If not, I’m sure EVERYONE will be able to find SOMETHING they’d be willing to burn, pillage and rape over.
Albeit, most might not abide by that order.

It seems clear now that Europe may rebuild Afghanistan escorting military operations conducted by US troops and contractors. NATO will continue to turn over people to the regime which will torture them in many cases (and who knows, maybe before it’s all over, he’ll be a terrorist). Basically, NATO will have to join the fight to control the mass population. This is a mixed strategy because the european army is still more or less mixed. The variants that come into play are along very nuanced and interacting paths. Belgians way of training troops (military or neighbourhood cop) will define the post-revolution (1979) landscape and shape the future junta. Civics lessons are nice idea, law and order is currently the talibans monopoly.
If post-colonial powers cannot succusfully install a stable oilpipeline, there’s no telling what Russia will do. Their willingness to make sacrificies is equalled only by the largest empire history has ever seen, funded by the chinese.
If India gets its tech people to run the japanese fighterdrones (they’re decades ahead, don’t tell me they don’t have transformers fully functioning), there’s no predicting how this will end.
Europe will be sick of getting a lousy oil/gas deal from its Ursidae second-world, almost complete capitalist third-world (those are the only ones that AREN’T protectionist, are weren’t because they were raped and pillaged on a metaphysical level) country.
Seriously, there’s nothing there but rocks. Leave it alone, a good part of the 20th century were moderate. Giving women the right to vote that is, maybe that’s too radical.
Exactly what kind of reaction are we trying to provoke with locals?
“Hello, I’m white and well armed. I’m here to help,”?
The Fundament (Al Qaida) is likely to hold a firm ground where the biggest army decides to draw lines in the sand.
Obama’s adviser (from Carter era) still wants a capitalist state of whatever regime, despite what the populations’ desire for afghan democracy and independance. The Mujahedin were his doing and Bin Ladens’ CIA training was hybris in the making. Breeding this medieval environment is manifest doom.
We will not win. Winning has no parameters, they’re infinite. The afghan civil war has to be thrown aside for securing oil and gas. The history of this region has only one, dominant lesson. It has huge blowback. In the long run, the gorilla movement has owned those caves. Even if we end up nuking every square inch (I think there are enough nukes for that on the planet) of that state, we’ll still end up with radiated oil.
So, what ARE we doing there?

Personalities of past presidents have been intertwined with, amongst other things, their death. Lincoln was shot, FDR died in office from polio. Which you would like to see Obama end his career with?
Or is it Kennedy’s escalation in around Vietnam. The middle-east will be the new Indochina. Then again, that guy got shot too. So maybe another policy or charismatic option is required for hopefull change.
Now they(Robert Gates and alike) want to do the same thing to afghanistan as they did in Iraq.
Obama doesn’t want to get into the medical marihuana debate (states allow it) because it would waste political capital. Joe Biden and Clinton are allowed to run affaires that are abroad. How is he going to respond to the very real fact that cannabis has replaced opium as a crop. This major cash crop also has a low THC-variant, hemp. Industrial use of this was common for centuries, many taliban tribes haven’t evolved either the last couple of centuries, mind you. Making the plant illegal has been an on again, off again relationship. The use of any substance that can impair judgement is considered haram, forbidden. Then again, when fighting infidels, Al Qaida and other extremists find no fault in allowing production and storage of opium and cannabis (the variant that can also be used for medicinal purposes) to skyrocket to unseen heights.

Only in being realistic about the facts on the ground can you make adequate decisions. What kind of change will he bring after 72 years of prohibition (wood pulp and corn methanal could be ecologically and economically replaced in a sound manner)? Is there a scientific aspect that ought to enter the dialogue? It is time to reach beyond faithfulness and platitudes.
It is time, for change.

So maybe, Obama is Ron Paul.

Just kidding, unless Obama allows a viable, pluralistic, multi party system to take root; Ron Paul, Ralph Nader, Bob Barr and sorts don’t stand a change in hell ;-)

Disclaimer: Narrative may vary in time according to your place in the Universe. General and special rules of relativity apply.

“Look, lifeforms on the dry part of a watery celestial body.
They seem to multiply quite hastely. Oh look, they’ve developed a hierachic structure. Oh no, the top is inbreeding.
Let’s see what the masses are doing. Oh no, they’ve even more narrow sighted. Whatever instantly satisfies is chosen. The surving specimens are rather happy, the sad ones die quickly. The sad ones die quickly. Cognitive abilities are hampered due to massive consumption of dehydrating liquids.
Look at their habitat, this mammalian creature will probably have to evolve to adapt to such a drastically altering environment. The radiation might speed up the process. Then again, after growing thumbs; what’s left?

When I was child I wanted to suit up, with a briefcase and GO places. Now that I’m a little older, I realise that that’s not going to accomplish anything. I mean, there’s nothing you can do that can’t be done. Why should I want to achieve anything? Are my desires not just as much me as my performances?
You’d say it’s part of selfrealisation, that labor enables man to exist in its purest form. Being part of something greater is its own reward and makes you feel good about your’self’. But isn’t having a good time worth just as much? When did feeling good, and feeling good about yourself or nobler good (grand collective identity, tiny community) came to be at a par, and perhaps beyond. Our first duty now, is not just to obey the law anymore, it’s obeying the laws of economics. However, there’s not written by the people or for the people, they’re abstract musings which in practice often translate into inhumane policies which are forced upon small ‘states’ (former colonies) who must endure rules, never imposed upon industrial world.

So really, just tune out, and relax. It’s all fine. It’s not going to be fine, but right now it is. And there is only now. And here. And nothing else. No added value, no extra meaning.
Humans are a cosmic blimp on the grand scheme of things.

Because “Answers” is the honoray title of this site; I’ve decided to do a edited version of my previous post. It was a bit engimatically structured. This post may seem a little full of ‘Truthiness’ but oh well.

We can fix the deficit.
Tax the largest cash crop in existance and the others too.
We can fix our energy dependancy.
Biomass from weeds. (90% of fossil fuel can be replaced in this manner)
We can fix our warlike desire to compete.
Increased tolerance, creativeness, mutual respect and cooperation. (India had Ghandi)
We can cure cancer
(or at the VERY least fix chemo side-effects) and various other illnesses.
We can rebuild the world (Youtube: Hemp building materials)
(the blueprints can be written on the same hemp the US Constitution was written on)
We can rewire the world
Not just the way we think, but ropes made from hemp were strong and plentifull once. (Cellulose, same reason its better than paper and cement)
We can have our own sun. (Don’t blot it out just yet though)
Essential oil can be used for perfumes, cosmetics, soaps, and candles.
We can redraw our reality
Hemp oil can be used for lubricants, paints and inks. (preferably on a canvas ;)

Of course, there are some medical uses:
Between 1840 and 1900 over 1000 major medical articles recommending cannabis as a therapeutic agent were published.

It is still puzzling that no serious modern survey of the therapeutic value in cannabis has been conducted. This is because it is illegal, and may well be due to pressures from the pharmaceutical and drug companies who fear loss of profits if cannabis is accepted medicinally. Just imagine all those people growing their own remedy!

CANNABIS HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY USED IN THE TREATMENT OF:
* DEPRESSION
* ANTI-NAUSEA
* Appetite stimulant
* AIDS PATIENTS.
* MUSCLE SPASM IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS.
* ANTI-NAUSEA AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY TREATMENT ON CANCER PATIENTS.
* PAIN RELIEF in spinal injury, arthritis, rheumatics, sprains.
* RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
* ASTHMA
* GLAUCOMA.
* PARKINSONS DISEASE
* SPASTICITY.
* EPILEPSY.
* ALCOHOLISM
* WASTING SYNDROME, LOSS OF APPETITE IN AIDS SUFFERERS
* ANOREXIA.
* ANXIETY.
* PAIN RELIEF IN CHILDBIRTH AND IN MENSTRUATION AND IN SPINAL INJURY.
* INSOMNIA.
* HERPES.
* NEURALGIA.
* DRUG ADDICTION.
Marijuana Could Help Cocaine Addicts Kick Habit: New Scientist, 4 October 2001
* BRAIN TUMOURS.
* MIGRAINE
The other option is disregard one quarter of the population because they’ve used it at one point in their lives as ‘pothead opinions’. And claim their views are obviously skewed (on the basis that once you’ve gotten high, you can never get be properly low again).

If you die before you’re 74, most probably reason you’re already dead is:

Lungcancer (hits 1.1% of the men, 4% of the women), coronary heart disease (0.9% of the men die this way, 3% women), suicide (0.8% and 0.3% actually succeed), traffic accidents (0.5% males unavoidably died, 0.2% females), Cerebrovascular disease (0.3% for all people equally), COPD (0.3% and 0.1% of crap in their lungs) and casualties of breast cancer (except for 0.7% of the women)!

So next time you say safety above all, or make a list of things you’re willing to die or let people die from something. Remember this list.

Recently, after years of american tax-payer support for the ineffecient millitary that protects the theocratic entity that is called Israel (a state only loyal to people of a certain religious affiliation rather than humans regardless of point of view), the USA has finally implemented its first actual base.

Because over 3 billion people believe in monotheism these days, it’s fun to quote their holy books:

Deuteronomy 28:49

The LORD shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, [as swift] as the eagle flieth; a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand;

My point is of course the eagle; it’s as obvious as obscure references of Nostradamus to two towers burning on the 28th year anniversary of the 9/11.

I know what you sceptics are thinking: If it were gods’ word. It would be real clear and easy to understand.

But here’s the beauty of the monotheistic argument: God is indivisible. Like the roman general who wished to see the face of God by going deep into the temple, thinking he’d come across something like an image of Jupiter(the god not the planet), there’s just an empty room. Because you cannot ascribe any (human, but the point remains) characteristics to this one god. Of course, this does uproot the whole “sacred text” thing. Because all traditions, texts, moral views are equally Gods’ creations and cannot be viewed as seperate; nor can god be viewed as either good or bad, simple or complex, easy or hard to understand.

Being both moral and immoral, God could be described as amoral if anything. There is neither good or bad, but thinking makes it so as Shakespeare once said. Perhaps that is why so many people are fighting for the message of peace and hope with weapons and hate. Because if God has to be said to be one thing, it is a coktail of everything. EVERYTHING.

The middle-east has often been viewed as a place that nowadays could not form democratic institutions or traditions. This is not true, under harsh occupations, palestinians were able to hold a free and fair election. However, not following the general rule of the middle-east countries (often created by the old brittish empire and given formal though fairly hollow democratic institutions) by causing instability and lacking an iron fisted dictator (preferably backed with massive military aid, also called aid, but really weapons. Like Egypt and Saudi-Arabia), this was quickly dismissed and the people living in this densely populated area were thrown into starvation and conditions of life which persist to this day.

I just needed to get that off my chest after hearing: Let’s all pray for world peace and for terrorists to stop.

To which my standard response remained: Let’s talk to people who do harm, rather than pray (alone, quietly); mainly those in power, inspired by divine or statist illusions -servants of gods and kings in the olden day and the modern day remnants of that train of thought-, who use terror on a regular basis but also to those who are being brutally oppressed and at some point don’t wish to die alone, but take their perceived ennemies with them.

So finally, in chronological order:

To the jews: Killing 3000 people (real people, jews) because they were worshipping a golden animal is not my idea of “a just god”. Stop this, you just disobeyed the first rules written in stone, just brough down from the montain where Moses was given these holy rules; with nobody around to see it.

To the christians: Hang out with fishers and whores, maybe even a taxational officer or politician or somebody else equally despised. Also, don’t forget to let your hair and beard grow in his image rather than celebrating how romans used to brutally torture criminals to death back than.

To muslims: Ok, you’re lagging 600 years behind christianity. So I’ll comment again when we’ve reached the maturity level of your counterparts. Just keep the crusades, witch burning and whatnot to a minimum ’till then.

“Faith: not wanting to know what is true.”
- Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.