Skip navigation

Category Archives: egypt

In Confoederatio Helvetica, a utupic future (and not so distant past), might look like this.
Morning, get up. Wash with water.
Need soap and shampoo from pant H. It grows on the mountainside and requires no maintenance.
Just water. Which flows because of global warming from our precious glacier.
I like the smell, so I made deodorant (also made from H) also smell like it. I´m not a lavander person.

Time to eat something. Ate last of my personally slaughtered chicken yesterday. Time for something less meaty today. Let´s see. Tomorrow I might eat soy, but for now, something more digestable. I´ll just take some seeds from plant H from the near brook. It´s got energy (567 calories/100g), Protein (30.6/100g), Carbohydrate (10.9) Dietary fiber (6), Fat (47.2), Saturated fat (5.2), Oleic (18:1 Omega-9, 5.8), Polyunsaturated fat (36.2), Linoleic (18:2 Omega-6 27.6), Linolenic (18:3 Omega-3 8.7), Linolenic (18:3 Omega-6 0.8). And zero cholesterol. About 5grams will be water from the near brook, but I’m cool with that.
It’s got Vitamin A, Thiamine (Vit B1) , Riboflavin (Vit B2), Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Calcium and Iron. So that’ll be enough for breakfast. Save some of the seed oil for treatment of eczema.
Also no gluten in it, so I can share it later with people who have celiac disease.

It´s noon. I just worked in the barn, feeding the animals with plant H I brought back from the mountainside. What they don´t eat can be used as hay. I´m exhausted. Still have a long day. Better eat something made of plant C butter. Can´t swallow the painkillers because they have too many side-effects on my stomach.

Evening. Just looked to see if plant C was doing fine. I try to keep it seperate from plant H. Otherwise it all turns H. Far relatives of hop, which I don´t brew. I don´t need to have an industrial only variety to make of for this lacking thirst as they call it. I harldy use Fords T-model. Made it after his and diesels design myself. Same fuel source and all. Made from, mainly plant H and runs on it too.
Time to relax. I eat some more butterscones from C. I throw some of the outdoor variety on the campfire, it was growing too close to H and might start mixing. I take some more blankets to keep warm, also made from H, as are my clothes.

As I write this down on paper made from H, I take some plants C and vaporize it to fight the depressing and grim reality. This isn´t utopia, this is the real world.

My plant H is of course, Herbicide. Plant C, Change.

Update: I couldn´t stop nature from crosspollinating. The plant spreads like a weed. Growing in all climates and deserts. Withstanding the conditions of central asia. Even though it originated from the rainforest. Started growing the domisticated variety, tribes used it a couple of thousand years in this manner. The molecule with medicinal values reaches 8% which is sufficient.

I just saw the clip “Rise Against – Re-Education (Through Labor)” and it reminded me of Fight Club. But also of 24 and Xe.
The clip started with a quotation from John F. Kennedy:”Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

Now, if all of us (wealthy worldcitizens, access to internet etc) were to adopt this principle; the world would be an ugly place.

Don’t get me wrong, I like JFK. But the (cold) war rethoric bothers me. If anarchists (meaning people who identify themselves with the anti-authoritarian tradition) were to use the ‘propaganda of the act’ as it were, we’d all be terrorists.

If ANYBODY, starts adressing their grievances (such as state terror on a massive scale) by mimicing the abhorrent behavior, we’re in for a very long and destructive circle (if not spiral, but I doubt cycle) of violence.

Imagine, the anarchist cookbook and the destructive nature of such literature being applied by all extremes of the political spectrum. From left wing commies, claiming all private property is theft, to right-wing contractors who feel the only way to keep order is to do it themselves.
That doesn’t include the people desecrating public property because they feel what one arm of government does, they should annihilate its legs.

The logic is destructive. Meanly because it’s war logic. If you look at this as a war, we’re all going to be fucked.
But as george carlin points on (on education -must see!-), the owners of this country won’t allow us to learn anything. So if we (the masses) can’t think (if that’s reserved for elites), we’ll have to act. Without rational thought I feel this could easily lead into harsh situations.

However, if one (leftist) would replace say, class warfare with class cooperation, he’d quickly have a fundamental change of position (even it’s its only implemented after nationalising the collectives’ wealth); we’d end up with fascism.

Which is a difficult position to maintain. Of course, if you WANT power and you want to achieve your OWN political agenda: Fascism is the way to go.

It is the only thing that does not tolerate anarchy. It doesn’t even tolerate the mob. CIA had to rebuild that with the french connection (drug money, prohibition excluded liquids again). There was order in the streets. The manifesto had been somewhat realised. People listened, and the ones that didn’t were dealt with.

If I lived in the world wars, I hope I’d have been a pacifist. Maybe I’d had joined the resistance, because there was so much suffering around me and no wealth.

But right now, even if I were to -for the sake of argument- think of the current world regime/empire is more totalitarian than it could have been over 50 years ago, I’d still use non-violent means to address the issue.
Like say, words, ideas, concepts, etc.

There was a massive movement, even followed by the Czar (because his poor weaponry) leading up to the Great War. In the Second World War, it becomes hard to repeat Dwight on the american version of The Office and say that “it was a war we never should have gotten involved with”.
Even Einstein and Chomsky thought fighting it was right, and I kinda look upto these guys. But winning a war never determines who’s right, only who’s left.
In this case, the guys with the nukes won. Thank you a lot, Einstein!
And then there’s an MIT (pentagon budget) professor who teaches linguistics who can’t decide on paying taxes or not (or any other act of civil disobedience) because it might lead to fascism.

Of course, I don’t live in a country with the same budget lay-out (military is lik 15% here and most of it goes to social security and health, my region gives most its money away on education and health), so I pay my taxes (well I don’t because I’m a student and I hardly work, when I do the tariff is low and I give most of it away on causes so I get a refund). So even non-violent oppossition isn’t really an option for me either, either by voicing my opinion (because it’s easier to encounter people who might actually recognize me then in such a small country as mine) or by not paying taxes (even though 147 dossiers of 100000 known fraudulents cases are handed over to the justice department of further selection).

As for violence as legitimate means…To what? For what? What’s the end? In my world view it’s peace and non-violence. It’s dialogue, reason, and above all freedom and justice. The first two being the means. The latter two the goals, incompatible with legitimating violence.

For the ends are the means, and anarchism ought to be about deconstructing institutions of power (when classified as illegitimate), not about repeating mistakes of the past.

Make new ones. Do anything, try anthing. Just try not to infringe on other people’s right to do the same. And violence tends to target the weak. You may feel strong knowing that information is free and it’s surprisingly easy for any individual to destroy a lot of infrastructure, human lives, systems of dominance and whatnot.

If not, I’m sure EVERYONE will be able to find SOMETHING they’d be willing to burn, pillage and rape over.
Albeit, most might not abide by that order.

It seems clear now that Europe may rebuild Afghanistan escorting military operations conducted by US troops and contractors. NATO will continue to turn over people to the regime which will torture them in many cases (and who knows, maybe before it’s all over, he’ll be a terrorist). Basically, NATO will have to join the fight to control the mass population. This is a mixed strategy because the european army is still more or less mixed. The variants that come into play are along very nuanced and interacting paths. Belgians way of training troops (military or neighbourhood cop) will define the post-revolution (1979) landscape and shape the future junta. Civics lessons are nice idea, law and order is currently the talibans monopoly.
If post-colonial powers cannot succusfully install a stable oilpipeline, there’s no telling what Russia will do. Their willingness to make sacrificies is equalled only by the largest empire history has ever seen, funded by the chinese.
If India gets its tech people to run the japanese fighterdrones (they’re decades ahead, don’t tell me they don’t have transformers fully functioning), there’s no predicting how this will end.
Europe will be sick of getting a lousy oil/gas deal from its Ursidae second-world, almost complete capitalist third-world (those are the only ones that AREN’T protectionist, are weren’t because they were raped and pillaged on a metaphysical level) country.
Seriously, there’s nothing there but rocks. Leave it alone, a good part of the 20th century were moderate. Giving women the right to vote that is, maybe that’s too radical.
Exactly what kind of reaction are we trying to provoke with locals?
“Hello, I’m white and well armed. I’m here to help,”?
The Fundament (Al Qaida) is likely to hold a firm ground where the biggest army decides to draw lines in the sand.
Obama’s adviser (from Carter era) still wants a capitalist state of whatever regime, despite what the populations’ desire for afghan democracy and independance. The Mujahedin were his doing and Bin Ladens’ CIA training was hybris in the making. Breeding this medieval environment is manifest doom.
We will not win. Winning has no parameters, they’re infinite. The afghan civil war has to be thrown aside for securing oil and gas. The history of this region has only one, dominant lesson. It has huge blowback. In the long run, the gorilla movement has owned those caves. Even if we end up nuking every square inch (I think there are enough nukes for that on the planet) of that state, we’ll still end up with radiated oil.
So, what ARE we doing there?

Personalities of past presidents have been intertwined with, amongst other things, their death. Lincoln was shot, FDR died in office from polio. Which you would like to see Obama end his career with?
Or is it Kennedy’s escalation in around Vietnam. The middle-east will be the new Indochina. Then again, that guy got shot too. So maybe another policy or charismatic option is required for hopefull change.
Now they(Robert Gates and alike) want to do the same thing to afghanistan as they did in Iraq.
Obama doesn’t want to get into the medical marihuana debate (states allow it) because it would waste political capital. Joe Biden and Clinton are allowed to run affaires that are abroad. How is he going to respond to the very real fact that cannabis has replaced opium as a crop. This major cash crop also has a low THC-variant, hemp. Industrial use of this was common for centuries, many taliban tribes haven’t evolved either the last couple of centuries, mind you. Making the plant illegal has been an on again, off again relationship. The use of any substance that can impair judgement is considered haram, forbidden. Then again, when fighting infidels, Al Qaida and other extremists find no fault in allowing production and storage of opium and cannabis (the variant that can also be used for medicinal purposes) to skyrocket to unseen heights.

Only in being realistic about the facts on the ground can you make adequate decisions. What kind of change will he bring after 72 years of prohibition (wood pulp and corn methanal could be ecologically and economically replaced in a sound manner)? Is there a scientific aspect that ought to enter the dialogue? It is time to reach beyond faithfulness and platitudes.
It is time, for change.

So maybe, Obama is Ron Paul.

Just kidding, unless Obama allows a viable, pluralistic, multi party system to take root; Ron Paul, Ralph Nader, Bob Barr and sorts don’t stand a change in hell ;-)

Disclaimer: Narrative may vary in time according to your place in the Universe. General and special rules of relativity apply.

“Look, lifeforms on the dry part of a watery celestial body.
They seem to multiply quite hastely. Oh look, they’ve developed a hierachic structure. Oh no, the top is inbreeding.
Let’s see what the masses are doing. Oh no, they’ve even more narrow sighted. Whatever instantly satisfies is chosen. The surving specimens are rather happy, the sad ones die quickly. The sad ones die quickly. Cognitive abilities are hampered due to massive consumption of dehydrating liquids.
Look at their habitat, this mammalian creature will probably have to evolve to adapt to such a drastically altering environment. The radiation might speed up the process. Then again, after growing thumbs; what’s left?

When I was child I wanted to suit up, with a briefcase and GO places. Now that I’m a little older, I realise that that’s not going to accomplish anything. I mean, there’s nothing you can do that can’t be done. Why should I want to achieve anything? Are my desires not just as much me as my performances?
You’d say it’s part of selfrealisation, that labor enables man to exist in its purest form. Being part of something greater is its own reward and makes you feel good about your’self’. But isn’t having a good time worth just as much? When did feeling good, and feeling good about yourself or nobler good (grand collective identity, tiny community) came to be at a par, and perhaps beyond. Our first duty now, is not just to obey the law anymore, it’s obeying the laws of economics. However, there’s not written by the people or for the people, they’re abstract musings which in practice often translate into inhumane policies which are forced upon small ‘states’ (former colonies) who must endure rules, never imposed upon industrial world.

So really, just tune out, and relax. It’s all fine. It’s not going to be fine, but right now it is. And there is only now. And here. And nothing else. No added value, no extra meaning.
Humans are a cosmic blimp on the grand scheme of things.

Because “Answers” is the honoray title of this site; I’ve decided to do a edited version of my previous post. It was a bit engimatically structured. This post may seem a little full of ‘Truthiness’ but oh well.

We can fix the deficit.
Tax the largest cash crop in existance and the others too.
We can fix our energy dependancy.
Biomass from weeds. (90% of fossil fuel can be replaced in this manner)
We can fix our warlike desire to compete.
Increased tolerance, creativeness, mutual respect and cooperation. (India had Ghandi)
We can cure cancer
(or at the VERY least fix chemo side-effects) and various other illnesses.
We can rebuild the world (Youtube: Hemp building materials)
(the blueprints can be written on the same hemp the US Constitution was written on)
We can rewire the world
Not just the way we think, but ropes made from hemp were strong and plentifull once. (Cellulose, same reason its better than paper and cement)
We can have our own sun. (Don’t blot it out just yet though)
Essential oil can be used for perfumes, cosmetics, soaps, and candles.
We can redraw our reality
Hemp oil can be used for lubricants, paints and inks. (preferably on a canvas ;)

Of course, there are some medical uses:
Between 1840 and 1900 over 1000 major medical articles recommending cannabis as a therapeutic agent were published.

It is still puzzling that no serious modern survey of the therapeutic value in cannabis has been conducted. This is because it is illegal, and may well be due to pressures from the pharmaceutical and drug companies who fear loss of profits if cannabis is accepted medicinally. Just imagine all those people growing their own remedy!

CANNABIS HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY USED IN THE TREATMENT OF:
* DEPRESSION
* ANTI-NAUSEA
* Appetite stimulant
* AIDS PATIENTS.
* MUSCLE SPASM IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS.
* ANTI-NAUSEA AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY TREATMENT ON CANCER PATIENTS.
* PAIN RELIEF in spinal injury, arthritis, rheumatics, sprains.
* RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
* ASTHMA
* GLAUCOMA.
* PARKINSONS DISEASE
* SPASTICITY.
* EPILEPSY.
* ALCOHOLISM
* WASTING SYNDROME, LOSS OF APPETITE IN AIDS SUFFERERS
* ANOREXIA.
* ANXIETY.
* PAIN RELIEF IN CHILDBIRTH AND IN MENSTRUATION AND IN SPINAL INJURY.
* INSOMNIA.
* HERPES.
* NEURALGIA.
* DRUG ADDICTION.
Marijuana Could Help Cocaine Addicts Kick Habit: New Scientist, 4 October 2001
* BRAIN TUMOURS.
* MIGRAINE
The other option is disregard one quarter of the population because they’ve used it at one point in their lives as ‘pothead opinions’. And claim their views are obviously skewed (on the basis that once you’ve gotten high, you can never get be properly low again).

If you die before you’re 74, most probably reason you’re already dead is:

Lungcancer (hits 1.1% of the men, 4% of the women), coronary heart disease (0.9% of the men die this way, 3% women), suicide (0.8% and 0.3% actually succeed), traffic accidents (0.5% males unavoidably died, 0.2% females), Cerebrovascular disease (0.3% for all people equally), COPD (0.3% and 0.1% of crap in their lungs) and casualties of breast cancer (except for 0.7% of the women)!

So next time you say safety above all, or make a list of things you’re willing to die or let people die from something. Remember this list.

 

International officials believe that Bout’s business
practices—in particular, his refusal to discriminate
among those who are willing to pay the right price—
are, in fact, illegal. Peter Hain, then the British Foreign
Office minister responsible for Africa, stood in
Parliament in 2000 to lash out against those violating
U.N. arms sanctions. He singled out Bout, dubbing
him Africa’s “merchant of death.” But Bout’s
deals often fall into a legal gray area that global
jurisprudence has simply failed to proscribe. It’s not
for lack of trying. His peripatetic aircraft appear in
little-noticed U.N. reports documenting arms embargo
violations in Liberia, the Democratic Republic of
the Congo, Angola, and Sierra Leone. U.S. spy satellites
have photographed his airplanes loading crates
of weapons on remote airstrips in Africa. American
and British intelligence officials have eavesdropped on
his telephone conversations. Interpol has issued a
“red notice,” requesting his arrest on Belgian weapons
trafficking and money-laundering charges.

Ever on the lookout for a good business opportunity,
Bout even took part in humanitarian operations.
In 1993, he flew Belgian peacekeepers to
Somalia as part of “Operation Restore Hope,”
using TransAvia Export Cargo Company, one of
his first ventures. A year later, his aircraft flew
2,500 French troops into Rwanda to help slow the
ethnic slaughter there. In 2000, he transported
hostage negotiators to the Philippines, where European
tourists were being held by the terrorist group
Abu Sayyaf. He also frequently carried relief supplies
from the World Food Programme to impoverished
areas in Africa. And in the wake of the massive
Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004, his planes delivered
humanitarian goods and services to Sri Lanka.

THE SIEVE OF GLOBALIZATION
Today, international efforts to pursue Bout have largely
been abandoned. The cia no longer has personnel
specifically tasked with following his activities. The Belgian
money-laundering investigation has stalled over
internal feuding and lack of government interest. Only
the British maintain an active intelligence effort to
track him, and even that effort is greatly reduced.

THE HUNT FOR VIKTOR BOUT
Ironically, it was Bout’s humanitarian flights
delivering European aid that eventually led
authorities to his illicit activities. Bout decided
to expand his network northward in
1995, setting up several airfreight operations
in Ostend, Belgium, where Belgian
intelligence began investigating him for possible
gunrunning. Meanwhile, the cia was
picking up the first reports of his activities
in the Great Lakes region of East Africa.
And British intelligence officials in Sierra Leone,
worried about how their growing peacekeeping
force there would contend with the country’s steady
weapons flow, quietly set their sights on him, too.
“The difference between Bout and the others was
that Bout was an integrated operation,” says Johan
Peleman, a Belgian researcher who was hired by
the United Nations to help investigate Bout. “He can
source the arms, he organizes the transport, and he
can source the financing.” His genius was his ability
to provide a door-to-door operation from the
arsenal to the buyer.

By the late 1990s, Bout had emerged as the personification
of the new transnational threat—a highly
mobile global enabler, skilled at leveraging his
assets and loyal to no country, deftly operating in
several continents and shrugging off international
standards. The U.S. government, in particular, grew
frustrated by the limitations of international law.
After all, domestic laws could not extend to Bout’s
foreign arms deliveries. To apply pressure, U.S. officials
turned to South Africa, where some of Bout’s
planes had been based, and to Belgium, where police
had targeted his companies as part of a wide-ranging
money-laundering investigation. But despite
high-level requests, South African officials declined
to prosecute Bout due to lack of evidence, and the
Belgians and Americans failed to find common
ground on how to build a case.
Finally, in February 2002, the Belgian government
issued an international arrest warrant for Bout, charging
him with laundering $325 million between 1994
and 2001. But by then, Bout was safe in Moscow.
Asked if Bout was in the country when the arrest
warrant was issued, the Russian foreign ministry said no, even though Bout was giving live radio interviews
from studios in downtown Moscow. The next day, officials
grudgingly acknowledged he might be in Russia
but said they had seen no evidence that he had committed
any crime, and therefore could not act.

That is not to say the weapons business will disappear; there
are already people positioned to keep the arms pipeline moving. The
leading arms smugglers of the future are likely to include some of
Bout’s former business partners. One such person is Sanjivan
Ruprah, who allegedly helped Bout broker several major weapons
deals for Liberia’s former dictator Charles Taylor and arms for
Sierra Leone’s Revolutionary United Front. The 40-year-old Kenyan
national is on the United Nations’ asset freeze list and travel ban
for those deals. He was arrested twice (once in Belgium in February
2002 and then in Italy that August), but he skipped bail both
times. Ruprah is currently at large (and back in business) in Africa.
He is only one of the many arms traffickers who would try to
pick up where Bout left off. Dozens more are waiting in the wings.
But none will have the clout or reach of Viktor Bout. “On their best
days, [other arms dealers] couldn’t influence a war either way. They
were peanuts,” says one U.S. official who asked not to be identified
because of ongoing investigations of Bout. “Bout could make
or break a country.” It may be some time before we see the likes
of him again. —DF

Source: Merchant of Death. Origin: John Stuart Mill if you know what I mean, wink wink, nod nod.

Climage Change has rendered most of our secondary education geography lessons null. After all, if we’re serious about using up the water at an energy demanding rate, rather than receiving those forces of nature already at our disposal, why not simply help purify the water so it drinkable all over the world. Instead, we have BMW and lord knows what else driving our world mad. Constantly marketing the most inane concepts, from feeling smart to feeling fine.

Considering the history of heavy water and the current ability to supply filtered water to agrarian parts of the world, I am not convinced that hydrogen will play the revolutionary role it’s meant to play. The economic, political, social and technocratic elite concerned with dealing with these global issues ought not to forget that priorities at the expense of so many lives -though very very profitable, even on the long term in monetary terms- can have, as they say, karmic kickbacks. I agree, putting more tank station, with privately controlled energy supplies, all over westernized countries and after that to the third world, driving all our old cars will yield extra monetary returns. But is this really what we want in this new world order? Mind you, it is new in its own right and there will be order. One way or the other. Extremism in ideas, on many levels and scales is a continuing threat to normal, mundane and balanced lives. Whatever is considered chaotic, anarchistic and lethal has to perish. There is a peace process on the way to pacify the global disarray we are currently in, to reform the global community, into an international counsel. Reactionary elements wish to establish: Nations, States and everything in between. These will be the formal framework within which the concentrated capital will flow between the same tight-knit networks of people, families and institutions. Exempt from democratic control and transparency, which may enable principles such as universality to flourish.

The obstacle is the path. Be wary of juxtaposed means and goals. They are often contradictory, rather than a paradox. At face value, I can’t see hydrogen being a short term solution. The time frame being the climate and our current, conscious ability to effect it. Solar power, wind, water (gravity) and err.. earth? Captain Planet! A that reminds me of Ted Turner appearing on family guy. Where was I?

Ah yes, I was going on about common sense and a willingness to expand views beyond what we are used to. Here’s the collective by mode, which should give you an average view of what the means are or even goals of internet browsers:

Disclaimer: To cope with increasing traffic and requests, search engines often use a different, quicker and more selective algorithm.

Google’s hitlist:

1. paul gillmor
2. ipod touch
3. jennifer dunn
4. iphone price drop
5. paul gilmore
 
6. new ipod nano
7. shaq divorce
8. christopher nowinski
9. diacetyl
10. popcorn lung
  More Hot Trends »

1. bebo
2. myspace
3. world cup
4. metacafe
5. radioblog
6. wikipedia
7. video
8. rebelde
9. mininova
10. wiki

This is not all ,other interesting things are also there

Who is…
1. who is borat
2. who is hezbollah
3. who is eu
4. who is hot
5. who is capote
6. who is v?
7. who is banksy
8. who is mohammed
9. who is buckethead
10. ip who is

What is…
1. what is hezbollah
2. what is carisoprodol
3. what is acyclovir
4. what is alprazolam
5. what is tramadol
6. what is ajax
7. what is hydrocodone
8. what is vicodin
9. what is xenical
10. what is xanax

How to…
1. how to refinance
2. wiki how to
3. how to drift
4. how to podcast
5. how to scream
6. how to levitate
7. how to tattoo
8. how to blog
9. how to kickflip
10. how to draw

Define…
1. define promiscuous
2. define web 2.0
3. define ftw
4. define calidad
5. define ajax
6. define ensayo
7. define ciencia
8. define administracion
9. define harlequin
10. define filosofia

  1. Owen Wilson
  2. Hurricane Katrina
  3. Iraq
  4. President Bush
  5. Michael Vick
  6. Sen. Larry Craig
  7. Alberto Gonzales
  8. Miss Teen South Carolina
  9. Lindsay Lohan
  10. Fidel Castro

Now, were any of those more intresting than my feelings? Because that’s what marketing will tell you. Think tanks, feelgood initiatives and other consumer-orientated administrative organizations are enabling you to self-help your way to happiness. Which is ok, but it isn’t self-help. It’s help if somebody does it for you.  It’s not an autonomous action, we’re all interconnected. But to use influence or force to alter the behavior of another entity is to exert power. And that means politics come into play. Which reminds us of the charade of party politics, a total joke. The expertise of governing is surely that will bring people who know what’s best for other people together and will, by definition, find each other and pool resources, to expediate the effects of whatever changes they may have (if a new elite comes to power) wish to submit to the public and to coerce the public if it deemed it should be law. The interesting is that means nobody is above the law. Those defining law and interpreting it differently and getting away with it are therefore not manipulating the system for their own private gains, that would be silly. In a true, just and equal system such a thing would be impossible.

Lady Justice isn’t blind, she just doesn’t want to watch.

But there must be order! We must organize. An International movement, etc etc. The american bully must stop picking on the european nerds and stop spitting in everybody slightly browner than Obama’s face, that includes that radiating concept of a personality itself which has no policy that doesn’t make be think he’s a democrat hawk who’s trying to kick hilary clintons ass in how many places we can bomb while talking to old places we’ve bomb or help bomb joining hands with carreerbitches and evoluees as they used to be called in belgium, meaning black people who were glasses and read books written by old white people, who had a monocle. Aye, they were simper times. Now it’s all about not “sticking it to the man!” and “Staying out of jail”. In the olden days, we just cut off their hands if they don’t go cotton picking. Now they dig the crude materials crucial for making parts of computer hardware and nuclear technology. At least we give them contracts. US Congress shows that if minimum wage really needed to be raised to over 6dollars per hour slaved (these aren’t the highly valued functions like sitting behind a desk all day and deciding what to do with all the money left after taxes and impending restructuring), they would have done so. But they didn’t. Because that would cost precious jobs. Which, by the inherent value of labor, is just so freeing for the human body and mind. After all, how else can we buy those fantastic products and services we just provided for ourselves?

When the times comes when all long range travel is by rail, all transport by zeppelin and all commuting or daily gathering of food and supplies will be by an energy-efficient device. This personal mobile projectile should have limits to its innate ability to kill. Vehicular homocide is a serious problem. If freedom of movement is indeed an alienable right as the EU formally says it is, that should not only be true beyond its borders but also withing them, in daily life. Pedestrians and those unable or unwilling to use a motorized vehicle are even more likely to die, if only because of the high mortality rate exhausts cause. This has something to do with science and humans willingness to breath oxygen, all beyond my niche.

You can’t talk about hydrogen without mentioning oxygen, water, air and it’s past. So I won’t. I’m not going to spew all the data. I’m just telling you how I feel, because apparently that’s not important. Blogs don’t have to be objective sources of informations. Objective news isn’t a priority because people, humans, nationstates, extremists, average joe and jane aren’t objective. So it’s important to know where we’re coming from, we, the target audience. To vote, produce, consume, rent, hire, sell out and all those things. What’s important, so we can be catagorized and fit in to neat little boxes is to say what we feel. Well, I think hydrogen isn’t the answer. That’s how I feel and think. Truthiness all Colbert calls it. But now I still don’t know who killed the electric car.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.